A GDPR checklist for small business websites
The GDPR work behind a small business website, as a checklist to work through.
Privacy, accessibility and AI rules
In 2022 European regulators ruled against websites using Google Analytics. In 2023 a new EU-US agreement changed the picture again. This guide explains where that leaves a small business today, and when a cookieless counter is the better choice. It is general information, not legal advice.
Updated 29 October 2026, about 9 minutes to read
The short answer
Google Analytics can be used lawfully in the EU, but not by default. Since July 2023 the EU-US Data Privacy Framework has covered transfers to Google, which settled the main issue in the 2022 rulings. Its cookies still need the visitor's consent in the EU, so it has to wait for a yes on your cookie banner. If you only need visit counts, a cookieless tool is simpler to run.
Google Analytics is not unlawful in itself, and it is not compliant on its own either. Whether your use of it meets the GDPR depends on how you set it up. Two questions decide it:
So the minimum for a small business with visitors in the EU is a consent banner that holds Google Analytics back until the visitor agrees, with saying no as easy as saying yes, a privacy notice that names Google Analytics, and settings that collect no more than you use.
If all you want is to know how many people visit and which pages they read, a simpler tool without cookies may do the job with less to manage.
In July 2020 the Court of Justice of the EU struck down the Privacy Shield, the previous framework for sending personal data to the US, in the case known as Schrems II. From then on, transfers to US companies needed other safeguards, and regulators questioned whether those were enough given US surveillance law.
In 2022, data protection authorities in Austria, France and Italy each found that a website's use of Google Analytics broke the GDPR's rules on transfers to the US. The Italian decision, announced on 23 June 2022, shows the reasoning. It said visitors' IP addresses, browser details and visit times were sent to the US without adequate protection, that an IP address is personal data even when shortened, and it urged every Italian website operator to check its use of analytics tools.
The rulings were about transfers. None of them said that counting visitors is unlawful.
On 10 July 2023 the European Commission adopted an adequacy decision for the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. Personal data can now go from the EU to US companies that have certified under the framework without extra transfer tools, and Google LLC says it has certified.
The framework was challenged in the EU courts. On 3 September 2025 the General Court dismissed the challenge in Latombe v Commission and confirmed that the US offered an adequate level of protection when the decision was adopted. Further challenges remain possible, so it is worth watching, but for now the transfer question has an answer.
Google has changed the product too. It says Google Analytics 4 does not log or store IP addresses from users in the EU, Switzerland or the UK. It uses them only to work out a rough location, on servers in those regions, and then discards them.
The transfer question and the cookie question come from different laws. Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive says that storing or reading information on a visitor's device needs their consent, unless it is strictly necessary for a service they asked for. Analytics cookies are not strictly necessary in that sense, so in the EU Google Analytics needs consent before it runs.
Google's own terms point the same way. Its EU user consent policy requires sites using its products to get consent for cookies where the law requires it, and the Google Analytics terms require a privacy policy that discloses your use of Google Analytics and how it collects data. A valid banner:
The UK now differs. After the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, the ICO's guidance describes an exception for analytics used only to improve your own site, provided you give clear information and a simple, free way to object. It does not cover advertising, and an analytics provider must act only on your behalf. Check whether your setup fits before you rely on it.
The EU may change too. The Digital Omnibus proposals include a consent exemption for some audience measurement, but in late October 2026 the Council had agreed its position and the European Parliament had not, so the current rules still apply.
Consent mode is Google's way of passing the visitor's banner choice to its tags. It does not collect consent for you. You still need a banner, and consent mode reads its answer. It can be set up in two ways:
The consent types it passes include analytics_storage for analytics cookies, and ad_storage, ad_user_data and ad_personalization for advertising. If you run Google Ads, these signals decide what the advertising side may do with the data.
For a small business, basic mode is the cautious choice: when a visitor says no, nothing is sent. In advanced mode, the pings after a refusal still carry the time, browser details, the page that sent the visitor and a random number for each page view. Whether that is acceptable where you are is a question for your adviser, and European regulators read the cookie rule as covering more than cookies.
If you keep Google Analytics, tighten it:
Ask whoever set it up for admin access in your own Google account, and keep the property in the business's name. If you are moving to a new site, keep analytics running through the switch so you can compare before and after, as part of the website redesign.
GGSites does not use Google Analytics on ggsites.com. The site counts visits with its own code, without cookies and without storing anything on the visitor's device. Our privacy notice lists what it records for each page view:
To count unique visitors, the server combines the IP address and browser details with a random value that is replaced every day, and turns them into a short code. The IP address is not stored and the daily value is thrown away, so the code cannot be linked to a person or to other days. Browsers that send Do Not Track or Global Privacy Control are not counted, and the records are kept for 13 months.
Visitors get no cookies by default, as our cookies page explains. If we start measuring Meta ads, the site will ask first, and only a yes loads Meta's pixel. The cost of this approach is that we cannot follow one person's path across several visits.
Advertising tags need consent in the EU for the same cookie reasons, and Google's EU user consent policy also requires consent for using personal data to personalise ads. If you run Google Ads or Meta ads, your banner has to cover both, and your ad tags must wait for the answer just as analytics does.
To see which ads bring enquiries without relying on cookies alone, carry the campaign tags into the enquiry itself. Our guide to tracking leads from Meta ads shows how, and the same method works for Google Ads. A landing page for ads should have its banner, tags and form tested together on a phone before the first campaign.
On the websites we build, a banner appears only when the site uses tracking that needs consent, and that tracking waits for the answer.
Whichever tool you use, the privacy notice should describe it plainly. For a physiotherapy clinic using Google Analytics with consent, a paragraph like this covers the basics:
"With your consent, we use Google Analytics to see which pages are visited and how people find our site. It sets cookies on your device. Google processes this data for us and may transfer it to the US under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. Detailed data linked to your device is kept for 14 months. You can change your choice at any time with the Cookie settings link at the bottom of every page."
Change the details to match your setup: the retention period you chose, whether Google signals are on and the name of the link that reopens the banner. Our guide to what a privacy policy needs covers the rest of the notice.
Our GDPR checklist covers the rest of the site, from contact forms to access requests.
It can be used in line with the GDPR, with work on your side: consent before its cookies load for visitors in the EU, a privacy notice that names it, and settings that collect no more than you need. Since July 2023, transfers to Google in the US have been covered by the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. No tool is compliant by itself. Your setup is what counts.
No. In 2022, regulators in Austria, France and Italy found that particular websites' use of it broke the rules on transfers to the US, before the EU-US Data Privacy Framework existed. Since July 2023 that framework has covered transfers to certified US companies, including Google. The cookie consent requirement still applies, so it must wait for a yes.
Not for visitors in the EU as it stands. Its cookies need consent under the ePrivacy rules, so it should not run until the visitor agrees. Advanced consent mode sends cookieless pings after a refusal, which is not the same as having consent. In the UK, a newer exception for analytics may apply if you give clear information and an easy way to object.
For a small site, a cookieless counter such as Plausible, Fathom, Simple Analytics or Matomo with cookies turned off covers visits, pages and sources with far less to manage. There is no single best one. Check where each stores data, accept its data processing agreement and ask your adviser whether your country lets it run without consent.
Google says Google Analytics 4 does not log or store IP addresses from users in the EU, Switzerland or the UK. It uses them to work out a rough location on servers in those regions, then discards them. Page addresses, device details and the identifiers in its cookies are still personal data under the GDPR.
The name usually refers to the version of Google's consent mode that passes two advertising signals, ad_user_data and ad_personalization, alongside the storage signals. It carries the visitor's banner choice to Google's tags. It does not collect consent itself: you still need a banner, and in basic mode the tags wait for the answer.