The EU AI Act for small businesses that use AI tools
Which AI Act rules touch a business that uses AI tools, and which ones you can skip.
Privacy, accessibility and AI rules
A handful of laws now say when a business chatbot must admit it is an AI. They differ on who they cover and when the notice must appear. This guide lists the ones a small business website is most likely to meet, as of October 2026, with wording to adapt.
Updated 29 October 2026, about 8 minutes to read
The short answer
In the EU, since 2 August 2026, a chatbot must tell people at the start that they are talking to an AI, unless it is obvious. In the US, Maine requires a clear notice whenever a chatbot could pass for a person, and California bans bots that hide what they are to push a sale. The safe habit everywhere: say it in the first message, in plain words.
Say it at the start. A first message that tells the visitor they are chatting with an automated assistant, before they type anything, is what every rule below is reaching for, and it costs you nothing. The details differ by place, so the rest of this guide sets them out.
This covers the rules most likely to touch a small business website or chat window as of October 2026. US states keep adding AI laws, so treat the list as a starting point. It is general information, not legal advice: check the current rules where your customers are with your own adviser.
Say it in the first message, before the visitor types anything. A notice buried in your terms or privacy policy does not do the job.
Where, who it covers, and what it asks for:
Article 50(1) puts the duty on the provider: whoever develops the AI system, or has it developed, and puts it into service under its own name. A business that has a chatbot built for it and runs it under its own brand can be that provider. A business that uses a chat product under the vendor's brand is usually a deployer, and the vendor carries the duty. Either way the notice belongs in the chat window, so agree with your vendor who writes it.
The Commission's questions and answers on Article 50 say people must be notified from the start of the first interaction, in a clear and distinguishable way. Whether it is obvious that someone is talking to an AI is judged from the point of view of a reasonably well-informed, observant and careful person, and the Commission says that exception should be read narrowly. The notice must also meet accessibility requirements.
National market surveillance authorities enforce the rule, and the Commission says proportionality can be taken into account for small and medium-sized businesses. The rest of the Act, and what it asks of businesses that use AI tools, is in the EU AI Act for small businesses.
Maine's law is the one most likely to catch an ordinary business chatbot in the US, because it needs no intent to deceive. The question is whether the chatbot is used in a way that may mislead a reasonable consumer into thinking they are talking to a human. A chatbot with a human name, a staff photo and typing pauses could do that even if nobody meant it to.
The wording is also wide: "any other computer technology", which reaches beyond chat windows. Treat an AI voice answering your phone the same way. The remedy is the same too: tell people clearly and conspicuously that they are not talking to a person. For a phone line, that can be as short as "You're through to the automated assistant for Coastline Heating. I can book a visit or take a message. Say 'person' at any time to reach the office."
A breach counts as a violation of Maine's Unfair Trade Practices Act, the same law that covers other unfair dealing with consumers. If you serve customers in Maine, treat the notice as required and put it where nobody can miss it.
The 2019 bot law turns on intent. It is unlawful to use a bot to talk to someone in California online with the intent to mislead them about its artificial identity, to push a purchase or influence a vote. Most business chatbots never come close. But the law also says that disclosing it is a bot removes the liability, so the notice is your cheapest protection.
The 2025 health care law is narrower and stricter. If a California clinic or physician's office uses generative AI to write messages about a patient's clinical information, each message needs an AI notice and instructions for reaching a person. In a chat the notice stays on screen throughout. A message that a licensed provider reads and reviews before it goes out is exempt, and so are messages about appointments and billing. A clinic chatbot that only takes booking requests sits outside it. One that discusses symptoms or results is likely to sit inside it. HIPAA and AI chatbots covers the rest of a clinic's checklist.
California also has a law on companion chatbots, the kind built for ongoing social conversation, in force since 1 January 2026. It excludes bots used only for customer service or a business's operational purposes.
Colorado rewrote its AI laws in 2026. Its 2024 AI Act, which many older articles still describe, was repealed and replaced in May 2026 by a law on automated decision-making technology used in consequential decisions. Its notice rules apply when a business uses such a system to materially influence a consequential decision about someone, which a website question-and-answer bot does not do.
A separate 2026 law covers conversational AI services from 1 January 2027, with the disclosure rules in the list above. Its exclusions matter more to a small business than its rules. It does not cover a bot designed mainly for commerce or transactions, including product or service recommendations, shopping, ordering, payments, delivery, returns, customer support or customer service, nor one used by a HIPAA covered entity or its business associates. A plumber's quote bot or a dental practice's booking chatbot is likely to fall outside it.
Put the notice in the first message and in the chat window's title bar. Plain words beat clever ones. First messages to adapt:
Words such as "virtual agent", or a first name on its own, can sound like a person's job title. Say "automated assistant" or "AI assistant". If the visitor asks "Am I talking to a real person?", the chatbot answers truthfully, every time.
The AI chatbots we build introduce themselves as an automated assistant, and a visitor can ask for a person at any point. On our own site, the privacy notice says the same of the assistant in the corner: it is an AI assistant.
When a person takes over, say so, with their name and role: "You're now chatting with Maria from reception." When the person hands back, say that too. A visitor should never have to guess which one they are talking to. A customer service chatbot hands over many times a day, so get this wording right once and use it everywhere.
Our guide on adding an AI chatbot to your website covers the rest of the first message: what it can help with and what to do if something is urgent.
A notice that it is an AI does not cover the other things a chat window has to say or do:
In the US, general consumer protection law, including the FTC Act's ban on deceptive practices, applies on top of the state laws above.
If the first message fails, fix that today. Everything else on this list can wait for the next change to the chatbot.
It depends where they are. In the EU, the AI Act requires a notice from 2 August 2026 unless it is obvious. In Maine it is required whenever the chatbot could mislead a reasonable consumer into thinking it is human. California bans hiding it with intent to push a sale. Elsewhere, general rules on deceptive practices apply. Saying it at the start settles the question.
Usually not for an email a person checked and sent. The rules above are mostly about live conversations with an AI. Two exceptions: a California clinic that uses AI to write messages about a patient's clinical information, unless a licensed provider reviews them, and, in the EU, AI-generated text published to inform the public on matters of public interest without human review.
The laws use different words: the EU says an AI system, California a bot, Maine that the consumer is not dealing with a human. A line such as "I'm an automated assistant, an AI" says both things plainly: that it is automated and that it is AI. Vague titles like "virtual agent", or a first name alone, may not.
In the EU, the AI Act's rule covers AI systems that interact directly with people, and a voice agent does that. Maine's law covers any computer technology used in trade that could pass for a person. Elsewhere, check the local rules. Either way, say it in the first sentence the caller hears, and offer a way to reach a person.
Say so, with their name and role, the moment it happens, and say so again if the chat goes back to the AI. The disclosure rules are about the AI part, but visitors judge the whole conversation. A clear switch also helps your team, because the transcript then shows who said what.
It can. The AI Act applies to providers and deployers outside the EU when the output of the AI system is used in the EU, so a chatbot that serves visitors in Europe can be in scope. A US business with European customers should show the notice to everyone rather than try to detect where each visitor is.